Latvijas atvērtā koda asociācijas darbības atskaite 2007. gada pirmajā pusē

Uzrakstīju LAKA darbības atskaiti par šo gadu. Jāsaka, ka ir daudzi iemesli, kāpēc LAKA varētu tikt likvidēta (galīgi nekas nenotiek, aktīvi labi ja trīs pieci cilvēki, utt.), taču to ir tikpat daudz, cik pretējo iemeslu (nodibinātā pārstāvniecība, atpazīstamība, cilvēki, kas uz mūsu darbību vēl cer, pašu idejas, pēdējā laikā panāktais), kāpēc organizācijai būtu jāturpina darboties.

Dzīvosim, redzēsim. Bet pagaidām lasiet šeit.

Slashdot teksti #2

It's strange to be a Free software advocate working in the "closed software" world. I've mostly spent my time just trying to understand what makes "closed software" tick. In the end, these companies are trying to win the lottery (and if they already have, they are trying to turn the lottery into their own private mint that churns out tonnes of cash on demand). They spend money up front and are looking for a return down the other side. Generally speaking they aren't particularly interested in "building a business" -- i.e. creating a stable revenue flow and making a living off of it.

Especially with small companies, there is a need to generate some "worth" in the non-people aspects of a company. After investing $2-10 million up front, they are looking to sell the company (not the software) for $100 million to $1 billion. You can't sell a team of people for that kind of money (or so they think -- in other industries people pay significantly more for a portfolio of satisfied customers). "Owning" all the non-people assets of the company is paramount to their strategy. Using open source or Free software to reduce costs is not an attractive position for them.

Tik patiesi. Paldies wrook iekš to slash un dot par šo komentāru.